
The worms aren’t learning anymore, giving a colleague who follows odd science a little more context to see together.

Can worms really eat memories? Story flow and key facts
In the 1960s, behavioral psychologist James McConnell claimed that planarian worms could be classically conditioned and that their memories could be transferred to other worms through cannibalism. His experiments, though sensational, were inconsistent and eventually dismissed. Now, over 60 years later, Harvard neuroscientist Sam Gershman and his team are attempting to replicate those experiments — but they can’t get the worms to learn at all. Despite using the same protocols, sourcing worms from the same locations, and consulting original researchers, modern planarians show no signs of conditioning. This raises questions about whether past results were influenced by observer bias or if environmental or genetic changes have altered the worms themselves. While planarian memory remains unproven, newer studies in sea slugs and C. elegans suggest RNA-based memory transfer may be possible in other species.
Facts
- In the 1960s, James McConnell claimed planarian worms could transfer memories through cannibalism.
- Modern attempts by Harvard’s Sam Gershman lab to replicate the experiments have failed — today’s worms won’t learn.
- Over 36 labs in the 1960s reported successful worm memory conditioning, but results were never consistently replicated.
- Recent studies in sea slugs and C. elegans suggest RNA may carry memory-like information between individuals.
- Planarians can regenerate from fragments as small as 1/279th of the original worm, fueling questions about memory storage.
Canto visual news explainer. AI tools may assist production. Editorial policy





